Presentation: Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network (EMAN)
Slide 1
Engaging Communities in Monitoring Ecosystem Health and Improving
Decision-Making
Hague Vaughan
EMAN Coordinating Office
Environment Canada
Transforming and enhancing the effectiveness of ecosystem health
monitoring programs by building complimentary localized capacity
in communities across Canada to collect, share and use ecological
information for informed decision-making and the adaptive management
of sustainability
Slide 2
S&T Service Transformation Issues
- ISSUE 1: WHY? What are the main objectives
/ desired impacts of transforming S&T-based public knowledge
services?
- ISSUE 2: HOW? What are essential conditions/requirements
in order to transform these services?
- ISSUE 3: WHAT, WHEN? Which elements of the
Government of Canada’s draft “Service Vision”
(and future implementation strategy) are most relevant to transforming
these services?
Slide 3
WHY: Societal requirements, expectations and under-filled needs
- Inform the process of sustainability and adaptive management:
- Timely, useful feedback
- Place-based
- Timeliness vs certainty
- Inform decisions and choices of others: individuals,
processes and forums
- Characterize needs, design to deliver
- Support appropriate inclusion of environmental info:
- Triple Bottom Line, 5 Capitals, Continuous Improvement,
Natural Step
- Engage industry, planners, engineers
Slide 4
WHY: Societal requirements, expectations and under-filled needs:
cont'd
- Develop social capital and community
engagement in inclusive processes
- Deliver useful info to conserve or enhance ecosystem
functions and services
- Status, change, criteria and resilience
- Relate to human health, welfare, competitiveness, environmental
health
- Meet requirements for sound, responsive, relevant policy
- Support integrated management at multi-community,
multi-use, multi-stakeholder watershed/airshed/landscape/ seascape
scales
- Outcomes as a program performance measure
Slide 5
EMAN and the Enhancement of Ecological Monitoring Effectiveness
Investigations and pilots:
- How to better integrate & communicate science
- The assumption of responsibility to do so
- How to better deliver info that is specifically tailored to
the needs of policy and decision-makers
- How to develop the public capacity to generate and use that
information
Slide 6
EMAN CO
Through the development and maintenance of partnerships, enhance
EC’s/Canada’s capacity to collect, access, integrate,
manage, interpret, apply and deliver sound data and information
on ecosystem changes
Focus: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Ecosystem
Monitoring through
- Standardization
- Engagement
- Assessment
- Delivery
EMAN Environmental Monitoring Variables and NatureWatch
Slide 7
EMAN Ecosystem Monitoring Protocols
Abiotic
- Water Quality
- (dissolved oxygen,
- clarity)
- Stream Flow
- Lake Levels
- Air Quality
- Soil Temperature
- Permafrost depth
- Snow-Ice Phenol-ogy
- Lake Sediments
|
Biotic
- Species Richness and Diversity (amphibians, worms, mammals,
birds, plants, benthos)
- Indicator Species Group
- Community Biomass
- Community Productivity
- Plant Phenology
Cultural
|
Slide 8
Community Ecosystem Monitoring Toolkit
- Biota: Frogs, Salamanders, Pollinators
- Climate: ice, plant phenology
- Soil: worms, chopstick decomposition
- Vegetation: tree health, seedling survival
and biodiversity plots
- Air: lichens
- Water: benthic invertebrates
- Other: water levels, secchi, anecdotal reports,
local/traditional knowledge, social & economic indicators,
valued attributes
- Methods, data quality, data mgmt,
- mapping, interpretation, delivery
Slide 9
Ecosystem Services
Provisioning
Goods produced or provided by ecosystems
- Food
- Fresh water
- Fuel
- Wood
- Fiber
- Bio-chemicals
- Genetic resources
|
Regulating
Benefits obtained from regulation of ecosystem processes
- Climate regulation
- Pest & Disease control
- Flood control
- Detoxification
|
Cultural
Non-material benefits obtained from ecosystems
- Spiritual
- Recreational
- Aesthetic
- Inspirational
- Educational
- Communal
- Symbolic
|
Supporting
Services that maintain the conditions for
life on earth
- Soil formation
- Nutrient cycling
- Pollinatio
|
Slide 10
Environmental Monitoring Goals
- Characterization of baseline conditions
- Surveillance and Detection of change
- Description of recent and historical status and trends
- Long-term understanding or prediction of processes, linkages
& relationships
- Mandated obligations at inter-jurisdictional
sites, on federal lands and in relation to species of national
concern
- Resource management including effluent effects,
environmental effects monitoring, compliance, emergency measures,
and establishing the need for, probable effects or success of
interventions
Slide 11
Environmental Monitoring Goals
- Delivering effective feedback on the adequacy
of policies and programs and on the effects of development patterns
or trends
- Providing timely identification of emerging
environmental problems
- Providing policy-makers with a sound basis for effective
action
- Delivering information effectively to decision-makers
including the public, stakeholders, research personnel, and managers
so informed decisions and choices can be made
Enhancements are required.
Slide 12

If the content is not accessible to you,
please contact us for alternate formats.
Slide 13
Exponential Change

If the content is not accessible to you,
please contact us for alternate formats.
Slide 14
A Human Health Adaptive Management Model

If the content is not accessible to you,
please contact us for alternate formats.
Slide 15

Modified from Cairns, McCormick & Niederlehner '93
If the content is not accessible to you,
please contact us for alternate formats.
Slide 16
Opportunities & Challenges
- Role for Community Groups
- Need for effective delivery of environmental status, trends
as feedback:
- 3 Pillars
- 5 Capitals
- Continuous Improvement
- Triple Bottom Line
- Marketing and education
- Approaching planners, decision-makers, officials
Slide 17
Lessons Learned: Linear Themes
| Initial Context |
Potential Catalysts |
Potential Outcomes |
Broader Outcomes |
Existing Capacity
Timing & Readiness
Political Will
Partnerships
Environmental Values |
Coordination
Inciting Issues
Articulated Planning Needs
Multistakeholder Dialogue
Vision for Sustainability |
Ecological Monitoring
Volunteers & Champions
Adaptive Management
Political Influence
Measurement of Indicators |
Knowledge
Sosial Networks
Improved Governance
Demand-driven Science
Sustainabillity Models |
Slide 18
Phases of Community Engagement Spiral

If the content is not accessible to you,
please contact us for alternate formats.
Slide 19
Contributing to Community Sustainability
- Inform local decisions, facilitate adaptive
management, initiate links to science, create Social Capital
- Local definition of sustainability
- Can Community Monitoring Network, CitizenScience
and other ongoing initiatives
- Limited experiment: basis for proposed EC program
+ repeat at multi-community and –sector watershed scale
- Initial mapping: status, priorities and ownership:
Ice, Lichens
Slide 20
Nature and characteristics of info to influence policy process/people
- Relevant to problems and players;
- Useable in form and for a specific context;
- Targeted, accessible and understandable to
its audience;
- Integrated, and suggest a course of action;
- Timely;
- Allow decision-makers to weigh choices, trade-offs
and consequences
- Ensure those involved continue to be in control of the problem
Tailor these through dialogue
Slide 21
Broader Issues and Contexts Demand a Modified Approach
- Ecological (inclusive and complex)
- Sustainability (choice and risk)
- Place focus (integrated, comprehensive)
- Deliver according to the needs of decision-makers
- Create conditions & capacity to deliver and use tailored
information
Slide 22
Potential Enhancements to Environmental S&T Agencies
- Identify and Respond to emerging concerns
- Adaptive monitoring, surveys and research
- Demand-driven designs
- Focus on Delivery of needed info and Capacity to use
- Boundary Organization Strategy?
Slide 23
Informing Stakeholder Decisions: Proposed Road Forward
- Fully embed in test communities; apply and improve lessons
in new; develop increased parks, industrial links & approach
for northern and aboriginal
- Research & Develop specifications for application in multi-community
/ multi- functional / multi-sectoral Landscapes/ seascapes/watersheds
- Support CCMN Community of Practice
Common Needs:
- Central coordinating roles + Regional Centers and Networks
- Scientific support including protocols, suites, training and
databases
- Support for pilots + Seed money for rotating ~20 month community
engagement
Slide 24
Application in Other Regimes/Domains: Watersheds, Landscapes,
Seascapes
- Governance Issues: multi-community, multi-sectoral and multi-functional
- Layer cake of licensing & governance
- Optimization
- Water qual/quant management, best practices, optimal yields,
economic diversity, cultural values
- Health, security, sustainability
- Biodiversity, habitat
- C sequestration
- Ecological Services, functions and resilience
- Criteria, Standards and Effective Delivery
Slide 25
Hamilton Arboreal Lichens

If the content is not accessible to you,
please contact us for alternate formats.
Slide 26
Preliminary Vancouver Results

If the content is not accessible to you,
please contact us for alternate formats.
Slide 27
1960 to 2001 Change in Ice-Off Date

If the content is not accessible to you,
please contact us for alternate formats.
Slide 28
Benefits
Individuals, Community Groups & Municipalities :
- Standardized, comparable environmental info tailored to decision-making
process
- Support for adaptive management of resources and sustainability
- Increased citizen engagement and social capital
- Effective non-confrontational role for special interests
- Inclusive process for consensus-building
Slide 29
Benefits
Municipalities Linked in Landscapes/ Watersheds
- Ability to identify & address shared environmental planning
and management concerns
- Common, comparable data and timely information
- Joint examination of costs/benefits of alternatives and trade-offs
Slide 30
Natural Resource Agencies
- Consistent, timely data to support indicators, adaptive management,
policy and assessments at all scales
- Active engagement and dialogue with clients, citizens, partners,
and stakeholders
- Outreach to foster stewardship, sustainability and an engaged
public making informed decisions
- Engagement of urban communities to achieve shared environmental
priorities
- Increasingly effective delivery of research and monitoring to
planners and decision-makers at community, watershed and
National scales
Slide 31
Opportunities and Directions
- Partnerships and Relationships
- Citizen science monitoring coordination and support
- Stakeholder engagement
- Demand-driven monitoring and delivery
- Outcomes as a measure of performance
- Watershed/Landscape research: services, habitat, BMPs, resilience,
governance
Slide 32
EMAN: the Power of Networks
Standardization Engagement Delivery
EMAN NSM: - Sustainability at the Landscape Level:
Supporting the Process through Multi-Stakeholder Participation”.
Nov 22-26, Penticton
For more information:
Slide 33
WHY: Societal requirements, expectations and under-filled needs
- Inform the process of sustainability
and adaptive management:
- Timely, useful feedback
- Place-based
- Timeliness vs certainty
- Inform decisions and choices of others:
individuals, processes and forums
- Characterize needs, design to deliver
- Support appropriate inclusion
of environmental info:
- Triple Bottom Line, 5 Capitals, Continuous
Improvement, Natural Step
- Engage industry, planners, engineers
Slide 34
WHY: Societal requirements, expectations and under-filled needs
(cont'd)
- Develop social capital and community engagement in inclusive
processes
- Deliver useful info to conserve or enhance ecosystem functions
and services
- Status, change, criteria and resilience
- Relate to human health, welfare, competitiveness, environmental
health
- Meet requirements for sound, responsive, relevant policy
- Support integrated management at multi-community, multi-use,
multi-stakeholder watershed/airshed/landscape/ seascape scales
- Outcomes as a program performance measure
|